Prisoner disenfranchisement policy: a threat to democracy?

Main Article Content

Mandeep K. Dhami

Abstract

The right to vote is one of the fundamental principles of democracy. However, full suffrage of the adult population has not been realized in many present-day democracies. Internationally, millions of prisoners (and ex-offenders in some nations) are disenfranchised. Being excluded from the civic process is a threat to democracy. In this article, I argue that removing a prisoner’s right to vote can lead to inequality and injustice that is counter to democratic ideals. By contrast, enfranchisement of prisoners can promote their rehabilitation and social reintegration, and can have a real impact on the political climate of a nation. I also discuss the arguments for and against prisoner disenfranchisement, explore public opinion on this issue, and track recent legislative changes to disenfranchisement policy internationally. Areas for future psychological inquiry are highlighted.

Article Details

How to Cite
Dhami, M. K. (2009). Prisoner disenfranchisement policy: a threat to democracy?. Revista De Derecho, 22(2), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-09502009000200007
Section
INVESTIGACIONES
Author Biography

Mandeep K. Dhami, Doctora en Derecho, Profesora de Criminología en el Instituto de Criminología de la Universidad de Cambridge. Su investigación se concentra en los ámbitos de toma de decisiones jurídicas, la psicología del encarcelamiento y la justicia restaurativa.

Este trabajo fue publicado en su idioma original en Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, Vol. 5, Nº 1, 2005. Su traducción al español corresponde a Pablo Marshall Barberán, profesor de Derecho Constitucional de la Universidad Austral de Chile.